![]() |
Eelgrass Inventory Links Painstaking Field Work, High-Tech Aerial Imagery |
|
Those
dealing with Endgangered Species Act (ESA) listings and salmon
recovery -- from tribes to local governments -- are finding that
solutions are elusive without better knowledge of shoreline habitat or
the extent to which nearshore vegetation should be protected. That=s
why a gaggle of rubber boot-clad volunteers organized by the Point No
Point Treaty Council (PNPTC) descended on eastern Strait of Juan de
Fuca and Hood Canal beaches in June and July to collect data on
nearshore vegetation. Their hands-on, painstaking work -- which
included counting individual blades of eelgrass in sample plots -- is
being combined with high resolution aerial photographs to develop a
detailed inventory of shoreline resources. Counties
are currently updating shoreline management plans in response to ESA,
and the data collected should help in developing regulations to better
protect shorelines and salmon habitat. AThe
idea is to collect baseline data on nearshore habitat, for which we
don=t really have much,@ said PNPTC habitat biologist Ted Labbe, lead coordinator for the study.
ASome
benefits of this huge effort may not be realized for 20 or 30 years
until we have something to compare it to. But some will be immediate,
because Shoreline Management Act regulations will be kicking in, and a
critical piece in those is that jurisdictions will do inventories of
shorelines.@ As
dozens of trained volunteers worked below,
a sea plane flying overhead aimed a fixed focal-length Compact
Airborne Spectrographic Imager at the shoreline. In one pass, the
sensor can record data from an 800-meter swath, using pixels with
1.5-meter resolution. The high tech equipment makes it possible to
achieve fine-scale resolution over a large geographic scale. The
field work will Aground
truth@ the aerial imagery, with the combined information creating a set of map
overlays charting types and distributions of nearshore vegetation,
particularly eelgrass, along with descriptions and locations of
shoreline structures such as docks, marinas and bulkheads. Volunteers
took advantage of extremely low tides in late June and early July to
count eelgrass shoots in random samples close to targets that could be
spotted by the plane. Field work also included digitally photographing
sample squares and fixing points with a Global Positioning Satellite
(GPS) unit. The
importance of eelgrass to Hood Canal summer chum salmon, which along
with Puget Sound chinook were recently protected under ESA, sparked
the study by PNPTC. Life history research into summer chum shows that
juveniles entering saltwater for the first time feed on small
invertebrates found in eelgrass beds. And to keep from becoming a meal
themselves, young salmon hide in the beds from predators. Eelgrass
beds also serve as a nursery for herring -- a favorite food of salmon
-- which lay their eggs on the slender green blades. The second
year of the study was funded by a $215,000 grant from the Bureau of
Indian Affairs to PNPTC, the fisheries management consortium of the Port
Gamble S=Klallam,
Skokomish, Jamestown S=Klallam
and Lower Elwha Klallam tribes. Consultants to PNPTC in the project
include the University of Washington Wetland Ecosystem Team, Earth
Design Consultants, and Hyperspectral Data International. The project
will require further funding to link the massive amount of aerial
imagery and field data, so organizers this fall are working on providing
analysis for a limited shoreline section to demonstrate to potential
funding sources what will be completed on a much larger scale. Labbe
said he was surprised at the number of volunteers participating in the
ground truthing, many of which came highly skilled. Representatives from
such groups as Wild Olympic Salmon, North Olympic Salmon Coalition, Port
Townsend Marine Science Center, Jefferson County, and Discovery Baywatch
joined the effort. AI
have very strong confidence in the data because of the backgrounds of
the people collecting it,@
Labbe said. |
|